This chart at the Korea Times shows how Korea is basically split down the middle.

Our Open Party (Uri) pretty much maxed-out its vote potential but didn't do too much along the eastern half of the country. Likewise, the Grand National Party faired poorly on the west coast, except for some areas in the swing Gyeonggi/Seol/Incheon districts (remember kids, its always all about what happens in Gyeonggi).



Thanks, I've appreciated your coverage of the election.
Posted by: LLB | Friday, April 16, 2004 at 12:28 PM
Many thanks, Yangban, your great informative & entertaining coverage of the whole election madness and political analyses places you on top of the Korea bloggers.
Posted by: Sugar Shin | Friday, April 16, 2004 at 02:30 PM
This isn't completely on point but I didn't know where to ask. What is the difference between the Korea Herald & Korea Times in terms of ideological reputation, quality of writing, etc.?
Posted by: Won Joon | Friday, April 16, 2004 at 03:52 PM
combined percentage of votes by region..
source: http://news.empas.com/show.tsp/20040416n04000/
Posted by: jh | Saturday, April 17, 2004 at 12:29 AM
Brilliant analysis!!
Posted by: jtb | Saturday, April 17, 2004 at 12:43 AM
This looks like a Korean map about 1400 years ago. PaekChae vs Shilla. Kind of freaky, but fully expected.
Looks like the folks of Choong Chung Do are never going back to support Kyong Sang Do anymore.
Unless, politics truly turns toward conservatives vs liberals.
Posted by: WJK | Saturday, April 17, 2004 at 11:17 AM
(NOTE: Yangban Edit)
Liberal party members. Conservative party members. What's the difference? They're all the (sweat love)ing same. They don't give a rat's (back side) about their own ideologies, they just use it to stay in power and hoard in "contributions". (Make sweat love to) 'em all.
Posted by: SUP | Monday, April 19, 2004 at 03:03 AM